Should everyone own a water resistant watch?
Following Anthony’s feature challenging the need for water resistant watches, we present the other side of the argument.
Grudgingly I need to begin by agreeing with some my learned colleague’s points. Perhaps not the best tactic for a counter argument but Anthony made valid points. In certain environments, say a trendy wine bar in Whitehall, a 300m water resistant watch is a technical irrelevance. A beautiful one if the watch happens to be a 124060 Rolex Submariner, but an anachronism, nonetheless. I recall interviewing the CEO of Formex for one of our podcasts who stated with some certainty that 90% of waterproof watches are never submerged; yet all his watches in the company portfolio offer 100m+ resistance because that’s what customers wanted.First let us take the sub-aqua world and place it respectfully aside. It really should not be part of this debate as it is obvious that a waterproof watch is important for adventurers who prefer their air supply pressurised. We will therefore focus on the non-SCUBA community. People who will never submerge their wrists in the ocean or at least no further than a gentle snorkel on holiday where 300M resistance is significant overkill - yet they love their Omega Seamaster.
I believe it is all about a mindset. There is a distinct type of person who feels reassured by having a 500m watch on their wrist. And this argument splits into two parts; first the confidence that comes with owning high capability equipment and second a sheer, unashamed, love of kit.
You can tell people who wear a waterproof watch before you see their wrist. They generally have a love of technically advanced equipment, and they draw confidence from having that capability as part of their daily routine, be it a car, phone, outdoor equipment or a watch. Whether it is a boost prior to an important presentation or the moment before you climb Kilimanjaro, having a watch that can take anything life throws at it does give you confidence. As you face a tough task, recreational or professional, and glance at your Tudor Pelagos you do get a tingle of confidence knowing that, at least one part of you, can face anything today.
And then there are the kit-junkies, a category I am happy to be bracketed into. I love technical watches that are at the pinnacle of their design genre. Whether it be a high end Speedmaster Master Chronometer Moonphase or a 1000m Squale 101 Atmos or an equally wonderful sub-£100 indestructible, anti-magnetic, Casio GA-100. What all these watches have in common is that they have been designed without compromise and part of that process is making a watch which will fight aquatic elements. For such minded people it is a basic requirement for a watch that it can hold back water or humidity. That its seals are tough enough to ward off inclement weather or fine sand. A watch lacking this capability (to me) is lacking something fundamental. And I argue that beautiful watches are made with this capability so why wouldn’t you have it?
If you ask me honestly, could I make it through a day without requiring a 200m water resistant watch then answer is patently yes! But if you asked me, would I want to do it, the answer is an equally emphatic no!
In the past, the realm of horology has predominantly catered to men. It was men that had the financial independence to purchase extravagant new timepieces and display them on their wrists as symbols of wealth,...
At WatchGecko we are often asked what NTH stands for, and one of the answers is “Nod To History”, which is hugely appropriate for the new NTH Legend Series. With this new range, NTH continues...